🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an observance that started out as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where Black people are paid to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the country. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the records is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an time that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not avoid governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.