🔗 Share this article

Transpired the manager endured losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and seems to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Clash Regarding System & Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as him – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

The New Football Order: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals set up? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, but still finally accountable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, their job is increasingly less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire them for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.